Switch

Core Differences Between Layer 2 and Layer 3 Switches

2025-04-07

I. Working Layers and Core Capabilities


Layer 2 Switch

· Layer Positioning: The data link layer (Layer 2) of the OSI model, realizing local forwarding of data frames based on MAC addresses.

· Core Task: Establishing direct interconnections between devices within a local area network to ensure efficient communication within the same network segment.

· Functional Limitation: Unable to recognize IP addresses, it can only handle communication requirements within the same broadcast domain, and relies on routers for communication across network segments.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

Related products as follows:

Layer 2 Switch, RGS5200-20P: 16*1GE + 2*1G RJ45/SFP+ Combo +2*1G SFP , 30W PoE port, POE Budget 250W

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

Layer 3 Switch

· Layer Positioning: The network layer (Layer 3) of the OSI model, integrating switching and routing capabilities, and supporting dual parsing of MAC addresses and IP addresses.

· Core Task: Realizing communication across subnets or VLANs, with both high-speed switching and intelligent routing functions.

· Functional Expansion: Directly processing data packets between different network segments without the need for additional routing devices to intervene.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

Related products as follows:

Layer 3 Switch, RGS5200-28XT: 24*1GE + 4*10G SFP+

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

II. Comparison of Working Mechanisms


Working Logic of Layer 2 Switches


Driven by the MAC Address Table:

Learning and recording the mapping relationship between ports and the MAC addresses of connected devices.

When receiving a data frame, determining the forwarding path only according to the destination MAC address.


Forwarding Strategy:

·Precise Matching: If the destination MAC exists in the table, directly forwarding it to the corresponding port.

·Broadcast Flooding: When the destination MAC is not recorded, flooding it to all non-source ports.


Typical Application Scenarios:

 Interconnection of terminal devices within the same VLAN (such as office PCs and printers).

 

Working Logic of Layer 3 Switches

 

Driven by the Collaboration of Two Tables:

· MAC Address Table: Used for Layer 2 switching within the same subnet.

· Routing Table: Storing information about IP network segments and the next hop, guiding communication across subnets.


Hardware-Accelerated Routing:

Realizing wire-speed processing of IP routing through ASIC chips, avoiding the software processing bottleneck of traditional routers.


Forwarding Strategy:

If the destination IP belongs to a different subnet, querying the routing table to determine the forwarding interface and re-encapsulating the data frame.

 

III. Differences in Functional Features and Performance

  

 


IV. Application Scenario Selection Guide


Scenarios Where Layer 2 Switches are Preferred

· Small Office Networks: Connecting devices such as computers and printers within a single network segment, and cooperating with routers to achieve external network access.

· Cost-Sensitive Projects: When the budget is limited, using the combination of "Layer 2 switch + router" to meet basic requirements.

· High-Density Access Layer: Deployed at ToR (Top of Rack) within data center cabinets, focusing on the interconnection of terminal devices.

 

Scenarios Where Layer 3 Switches Must be Used

· Enterprise-Level Core Networks: Dividing different VLANs for multiple departments, and requiring high-speed communication across subnets (such as the interconnection between the Finance Department and the R&D Department).

· Dynamic Routing Requirements: Achieving automatic path optimization through OSPF/BGP protocols in large campus networks.

· Policy-Based Traffic Management: Advanced functions such as QoS priority marking based on IP addresses and ACL access control.


V. Comparison of Advantages and Disadvantages and Decision-Making Suggestions

 

Decision-Making Suggestions:

· Simple Networks (Single subnet, low management requirements): Give priority to Layer 2 switches, and cooperate with routers to handle external network access.

· Complex Networks (Multiple subnets, dynamic routing, policy control): It is necessary to deploy Layer 3 switches as the core hub.

· Transition Solutions: In scenarios where the budget is limited but scalability is required, Layer 3 switches supporting basic static routing (such as some enterprise-level models) can be selected.


 ============================================================================================

If you want to learn more about related Switch products, you can contact us.

Related products as follows:

Layer 2 Switch:

Layer 2 Switch, RGS3200-10P: 8*1GE + 2*1G SFP+ , 30W PoE port, POE Budget 90W

Layer 2 Switch, RGS5200-20P: 16*1GE + 2*1G RJ45/SFP+ Combo +2*1G SFP , 30W PoE port, POE Budget 250W


Layer 3 Switch:

Layer 3 Switch, RGS5200-28XP: 24*1GE + 4*1GSFP+ , 30W PoE port, POE Budget 380W

Layer 3 Switch, RGS5200-28XT: 24*1GE + 4*10G SFP+

Layer 3 Switch, RGS5300-28XF:4*10G SFP+ + 4*1G RJ45/SFP+(Combo) + 20*1G SFP+:

Layer 3 Switch, RGS6300-26QS: 2*QSFP28 100G + 4*10G RJ45/SFP+(Combo) +20*10G SFP+


‌Take Action Now‌:

Visit our official website athttps://www.rltechnet.com or send an email to obtain free networking consultations!

 

Email: marketing@rltechnet.com

India Email: infoindia@rltechnet.com

Thailand Email: infothai@rltechnet.com

South America Email: infoamerica@rltechnet.com